I don't have children, so all this
bad-parenting-that's-really-not-that-bad doesn't resonate with me at all. This book is about a Columbine-style massacre
in which the perpetrator lives to stand trial.
The time period oscillates between the time before and the time after
the killing spree and focuses on the boy (Peter) who did the shooting and a
girl (Josie) who survived the incident—and their culpable parents. Josie and Peter were childhood playmates, but
then Josie started dating one of the despicable guys who tormented Peter, and
therefore Josie stopped intervening on his behalf. The author is not extremely judgmental about
the parents but certainly faults them for seeing only what they want to see in
their little darlings. Case in
point: Peter's older brother Joey died
in a car accident caused by a drunk driver.
Peter's mother found heroin and needles in Joey's room after his death
but didn't tell anyone, because she didn't want to taint Joey's perfect
image. Asked if Peter and Joey were
close, the mother responded that Peter worshipped Joey, when, in fact, Joey had
bullied Peter his entire life. The main
characters behaved badly at every juncture, and they all seemed to be
outliers. In other words, the story
would be more plausible if characters like Matt, Josie's boyfriend, had at
least one or two redeeming qualities. My
favorite characters were Peter's lawyer and his wife, who attempted to defend Peter
as being a victim of something akin to battered woman syndrome.
No comments:
Post a Comment