Don Tillman is a genetics professor in Australia who appears
to have an autism spectrum disorder.
Since married men are generally more successful than single men, he
embarks on the “Wife Project” and devises a questionnaire for potential marital
partners. Meanwhile, his philandering
buddy Gene sends a student named Rosie to meet Gene, and they hit it off,
despite Rosie’s obvious unsuitability as a mate, in Gene’s estimation. You can guess the rest. The “Father Project” is the activity which
binds this pair together, as Don and Rosie surreptitiously gather DNA samples
in an effort to out Rosie’s real father.
This exercise has the expected outcome as well and introduces us to a
swarm of characters that I found difficult to differentiate. Unlike me, Don has a near-perfect memory that
serves him well, especially when he and Rosie bartend at a class reunion
attended by most of the candidates for the Father Project. Don has memorized the recipes for myriad
obscure cocktails, delighting the crowd with his expertise. Obviously, Don is high-functioning, despite
his social disability, which only seems to manifest itself at the most
inopportune times. Gene’s long-suffering
wife Claudia takes on the task of mentoring Don in appropriate dress and
behavior, with mixed results. Don
narrates the story with the expected nerdy-sounding voice, and I enjoyed seeing
the world through his eyes, with his reactions to it. His literal interpretation of various figures
of speech provides the primary source of chuckles as I breezed through this
book. I would rate it as a pretty good
summer beach read, and I can already envision it as a run-of-the-mill rom-com
movie, unless the casting is particularly inspired.
I am usually a little put off when an author inserts herself
into her novel, but here it seems to work.
Ruth (in the novel) is experiencing writer’s block when a plastic bag
washes onto the shore near her home in British Columbia. In the bag is the diary of a 16-year-old
Japanese girl, Nao (pronounced “now” to go along with the time-related themes
here), and Ruth becomes obsessed with Nao’s story, surmising that the tsunami
of 2011 propelled the diary across the Pacific.
We alternate between Nao’s story and Ruth’s reaction to it. Nao lived in Sunnyvale, CA, until her father
lost his high tech job during the dot-com meltdown. Now Nao and her family have returned to
Japan, where Nao is having to adapt to Japanese school and suffers cruel
bullying from her classmates, while the teachers look the other way or even
join in the harassment. Nao’s father’s
self-esteem has reached rock-bottom, rendering him suicidal, and Nao figures
that she may as well end her life, too.
Her great-uncle, a scholar drafted during WWII at the age of 19, died in
a kamikaze mission, and Nao meets his ghost while visiting her
great-grandmother. At this point,
supernatural events start to seep into the plot, leaving me a little less
enthralled. The author juggles a lot of
themes here, but what really captured my attention was the unflattering picture
she paints of Japanese society. The
novel Unbroken comes to mind, as well
as The Distant Land of My Father,
both of which recount the deplorable acts of the Japanese military during WWII,
and this novel touches on that but brings us more up to date with what’s
happening in civilian life today—suicides, teenaged prostitutes, internet
hazing, and teachers complicit in bullying.
We’re obviously not immune to these problems, along with mass shootings
and police brutality, here in the U.S., and I have to wonder how prevalent
these issues are in Japan. Are they
limited to Tokyo? The cover-up of what
really happened at Fukushima nuclear power plant is particularly unsettling. Did regulators really allow the dumping of
tons of radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean? Maybe the water just leaked out—shades of the
Exxon Valdez and the BP Gulf disaster.
In any case, Ozeki seemingly presents us with a cultural mindset that
everything is OK, even when it’s not.
My first problem with this book was that I didn’t know what
C.E. meant. Thanks to Wikipedia, I now
know that it is the same as A.D., without the Christian overtones, and that
means higher numbers are more current. The
Romans have driven the Jews out of Jerusalem and seem intent on slaying them
wherever they find them. Then again, I
don’t think the Romans spared anyone that stood in the way of their conquering
armies. This novel, narrated by four
women, takes place in the first century A.D., or C.E., if you prefer, in
Masada, a town on top of a mesa, with a palace built by Herod. Yael arrives pregnant with her first child
after her lover and his wife have died of a fever during the journey through
the desert. Accompanying Yael is her
father, a member of an assassination squad, who barely acknowledges Yael as his
daughter, since Yael’s birth killed his wife.
Yael’s brother Amram is in love with Aziza, daughter of Shirah. Aziza would be one of Masada’s most talented
archers, but she is forbidden to use weapons because she is female. Shirah is the mistress of the leader of
Masada and is an expert in spells and potions.
Revka is the widow of a baker and had to kill her own daughter to end
her suffering after a vicious attack.
She now has charge of two grandsons, who have not spoken since
witnessing their mother’s death. Shirah
and Yael are lusty women in forbidden relationships, but the sex scenes in the
book are not particularly erotic. These
were violent times, but, again, the violence is not particularly graphic, until
we reach the gruesome finale. I did not
know anything about Masada prior to reading this novel, so that the conclusion
struck me as particularly insane. This
is supposed to be a novel about resilient women, but I couldn’t help thinking
that their paths would have been a lot less rocky if they hadn’t let themselves
become swept up in affairs with married men.
Consequently, the virtues of these women seemed to be diminished by
their impractical choices in matters of the heart. Also, the men come across as brutes, while
the women show compassion for doves, a Scandinavian slave, and certainly each
other. Aziza even loses her taste for
battle when she witnesses the slaughter of women and children in a raid for provisions. I wish I knew how historically accurate these
opposing portraits of the two sexes are.
Now I’m halfway through the TV miniseries, and I already know that the
ending is different, and half the characters are missing. Perhaps it will be an improvement.
March Murray, along with her teenaged daughter Gwen, has
returned to her Massachusetts hometown of Jenkintown for a funeral, after an
absence of almost 20 years. She knows
that she will also see Hollis, the love of her life. When Hollis disappeared years ago to seek his
fortune, March gave up waiting for him and married Richard Cooper, who loves
her dearly. Hollis made his fortune and
then some, as he now owns just about everything in town. While March and Hollis rekindle the flame of
their passion, Gwen falls for Hollis’s ward Hank, who happens to be March’s
nephew, making Gwen and Hank first cousins.
Gwen also develops a strong affinity for Tarot, Hollis’s washed-up
racehorse who has a reputation for violent misbehavior. When Gwen decides that she’d like to remain
in Jenkintown, the way is clear for the two of them to move in with
Hollis. However, Hollis’s attachment to
March does not extend to Gwen, another man’s daughter. Meanwhile, Richard knows about his wife’s
infidelity and wants her back anyway. I
would not call this a novel about love or even lust. It’s about an obsession that gets way out of
hand. I know domestic situations like
this exist, where a woman sacrifices everything, including her self-respect, to
be with a man who doesn’t deserve her.
Still, March had a seemingly contented existence with Richard, but the
unfinished business with Hollis probably tugged at her soul every day. I found the fringe characters to be more
interesting than March: Susie Justice,
who steers clear of all marriage opportunities; March’s cruel brother Alan
whose grief won’t allow him to become sober; and Susie’s father (a judge named
Justice? Really?), who carried on an
affair for decades under everyone’s noses.
The two big questions of the novel are whether March will come out of
her trance and whether Alan will find redemption. Gwen, though, is the one who really has an
opportunity to learn what she’s made of.
Marie-Laure LeBlanc and her father travel by foot from Paris
to Saint-Malo, France, to escape Nazi aggression during WWII. Marie-Laure, however, is blind and must
familiarize herself with her new surroundings with the help of an intricate
model of the town that her father builds for her. Werner Pfennig is a German boy, living in an
orphanage with his sister Jutta. Facing
a miserable future in the mines, Werner plies his skills as a radio technician
into an appointment to a Nazi training school.
Conflicted about the horrific hazing of weaker boys that he witnesses in
school, he still is grateful for the opportunity to avoid the same fate as his
father’s—death in the mines. Jutta
serves as his conscience, trying to coax him back from the influences of evil,
but he knows that the consequences will be dire if he tries to leave his
military training. The author flits
forward and backward in time—sometimes years and sometimes just a few months—so
that we know that Werner will be trapped in rubble, and Marie-Laure will be
alone and frightened—both in Saint-Malo.
Of course, even without this advance knowledge, we can assume that these
two characters will converge at some point, and the author entices us to follow
them back and forth in time. I am not
fond of this technique of telling the reader what is going to happen and then
telling us what has already happened, but this book in particular seems to
treat the timeline in a rather haphazard way.
As a reader, I would prefer to be challenged in other ways than in an
effort to keep track of where I am in the sequence of events. Each time the author heads a chapter with a
date, I should have made a written note, but what a pain in the
you-know-what. Overall, I liked the
book. Almost all of the characters are
kind and courageous, especially the townspeople of Saint-Malo. One heinous villain is dying of cancer, and
we can only hope that he fades away before doing any more real damage. The author does a stellar job of creating
Marie-Laure’s visionless world for us, especially during her loneliest and most
desperate hours.
At about the same time that Grace discovers that her husband
has been cheating on her, she finds that she is heir to a recently deceased
woman named Eva whom Grace has never heard of.
The novel bounces back and forth between Eva’s life and Grace’s quest to
unearth her benefactor’s story. Eva
forges some fortuitous connections while working as a hotel cleaning woman,
finds that she has a knack for counting cards, and becomes involved in perfume
making when she impresses a guest with a fragrant homemade cleaning
solution. All in all, Eva leads a pretty
exotic, if highly unlikely, existence, and does pretty well for herself,
particularly considering that she has a drinking problem. Grace, on the other hand, plunges into Eva’s
history, meets Madame Zed, who created the formula for the perfume My Sin, and
picks Madame Zed’s brain to find out why Eva has bequeathed her such a fortune. Grace’s husband does her a big favor by
giving her an excuse to explore a relationship with the attorney handling Eva’s
estate. This novel holds no real
surprises and no real conflict, but the book is a pleasant enough read, albeit
a little overly tame. I kept hoping for
some big revelation or battle, but none came.
Certainly the descriptions of fragrances, such as wool, hair, wood,
rain, and, of course, flowers, that are combined into perfumes are mildly
enlightening, but the subject of scents is just not something that really
appeals to me. I can’t say that I can
identify the smell of snow, for example.
This book falls squarely in the genre of women’s fiction, and it’s just
a tad too frilly for me.
Rachel pseudo-commutes to London every day to give her
pathetic life some structure and to live vicariously through a beautiful couple
whose home she passes on the train. When
the wife, Megan, goes missing, Rachel recognizes her photo and inserts herself
into the investigation, because she saw Megan kissing a man that was not her
husband Scott. The man Megan was kissing
turns out to have been her therapist Kamal.
Rachel formerly lived in Megan’s neighborhood, and Rachel’s ex, Tom,
still lives in their old house with his new wife Anna and their infant
daughter. So we have 3 women and 3 men
as main characters, and they are all unlikeable. Anna was Tom’s mistress while he was still
married to Rachel; Tom is a manipulative adulterer; Megan is a nymphomaniac
with a creepy past; Scott is possessive and overbearing; and Kamal obviously
crosses a line with his patient that he shouldn’t have. Rachel is the worst train wreck of all. She is an alcoholic busybody who repeatedly
drunk-dials Tom and has had more blackouts than she can count, including one the
night Megan disappeared, when she happened to be in the neighborhood to harass
her ex. She takes self-loathing to new
heights and struck me as a sort of completely dysfunctional Bridget Jones. If you’re expecting a twist on a par with
that of Gone Girl, I think you’ll be
disappointed. The identity of Megan’s
abductor came as no surprise to me, but the author does a good job of building
suspense, while leading us down numerous deadend paths. The biggest mystery to me, though, is why
this book has generated so much hype without delivering much in the way of
gasp-inducing thrills. This is nothing
more than a whodunit without many choices as to who the culprit is. A better literary thriller is You Should Have Known by Jean Hanff
Korelitz, who pretty much skewered The
Girl on the Train for the New York Times Book Review.