The Gold Coast is
my favorite Nelson DeMille novel.
Therefore, I felt that I owed it to myself to read the sequel. The length, however, seems a bit
self-indulgent on the author's part. I enjoy the witticisms of the narrator,
John Sutter, but the play-by-play of his every move is a little much. In fact, nothing much happens over the course
of almost 600 pages. The late Elmore
Leonard refused to review books that were more than 300 pages, and I'm with him
on that. Actually, I can go 350 with no
problem, but I digress. John Sutter has
returned after a 10-year hiatus to the estate where he once lived with his wife,
Susan. Susan somehow managed to avoid
trial for murdering her lover, Frank Bellarosa, a Mafia don and government
witness, 10 years ago. Now I ask
you: Why would John Sutter reunite with
this woman? She must be really beautiful
and really good in bed, but even so, I felt that John was a little hasty in
kissing and making up. Plus, since her
very wealthy parents dislike him intensely, they will surely cut off Susan's
allowance and her inheritance if John and Susan remarry. John
knows that Susan can't possibly adjust to a more frugal lifestyle, and what if
their two adult children lose their trust funds? John is an attorney, but he's unemployed at
the moment, and his past affiliation with the Mafia and a wife who literally
got away with murder may have a negative impact on his future opportunities. This just seemed like so much silliness,
especially in contrast to The Gold Coast,
which was such a good story about how seductive power can be. The plot of this book also has a darker
angle, in that Bellarosa's son Anthony wants to avenge his father's death. This means trouble for Susan, who can't quite
fathom that anyone would want to kill her.
See what I mean? She's a little
ditsy, and I just couldn't quite buy that John would so easily and quickly
forgive and forget. He lost my respect
by doing so.
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
THE LIFEBOAT by Charlotte Rogan
Books about lifeboats seem to appeal to me. I loved Life
of Pi and Unbroken, and this
novel is no exception. The story takes
place two years after the sinking of the Titanic, when another ocean liner has
wrecked in the Atlantic.
Grace finds herself in a crowded lifeboat with 37 other passengers, plus
a seaman named Mr. Hardie. Hardie
displays an obvious distaste for the likes of the over-privileged survivors in
the boat and takes some snide pleasure in rationing their supplies and
directing them in various chores. He's a
distasteful and shady character, but I had some difficulty in classifying him
as an outright villain, even as he forbids the others from hauling other
survivors out of the water into their already over-crowded lifeboat. Herein lies the crux of the story: How far should we go to protect ourselves in
a life-and-death situation like this? Do
the usual laws of a civilized society apply, or do the laws of nature, such as
survival of the fittest, seem more appropriate?
Or, more accurately, should a few be sacrificed in order to save the
majority? This question becomes more and
more pressing as the days stretch into weeks, and the characters become more contentious,
aligning themselves with competing factions.
One woman, Mrs. Grant, begins to form alliances with some of the other
women, who outnumber the men, and threatens Mr. Hardie's authority. The whole situation reminded me of William
Golding's Lord of the Flies—the mounting
desperation as the hope of being rescued diminishes, the uprising, the
savagery, and the matter-of-fact manner in which the author describes a climactic,
unthinkable action by a group of human beings.
We know from the beginning that Grace faces a court trial after being
rescued, but I can't possibly judge these characters. For what it's worth, the book is not
particularly gruesome; it's an adventure that will raise questions in your mind
as to what you would have done in Grace's position.
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
THE ANTHOLOGIST by Nicholson Baker
I have to admit this book put me to sleep at times. (On page 205, the narrator accuses the reader of "probably falling asleep." Guilty as charged.) Other than that small failing, it's a pretty neat book. Paul Chowder is a poet who laments the loss of rhyming poetry. He's compiling an anthology of some of his favorites, called Only Rhyme, but he's stuck on the introduction. In fact, his procrastination sends his girlfriend Roz packing. She knows Paul's potential but becomes exasperated with his inertia. Toward the end of the book, he compares writing poetry to mowing the lawn. You can start anywhere on the lawn, and you'll finish eventually, but he finds he gets bogged down in his writing, not knowing where to start. Other than his poetry obsession, Paul's life is pretty pathetic--buying a badminton set but not having anyone to play with, getting excited about a new broom, and observing the habits of a mouse, who wouldn't be a bad pet actually if he didn't leave droppings in the kitchen. That's about all there is, as far as the plot is concerned, but the book is chock-full of Paul's musings on a variety of both well-known and little-known poets, their work, and their demons. He brands free verse poets as basically lazy, and that may be a pretty accurate label, given that his own poetry doesn't rhyme. This book gave me a greater appreciation of poetry, especially of meter and the necessary "rest" at the end of most lines, than any English class. Paul answers an interesting question at a reading about whether one gets a better appreciation of a poem by reading it silently from the page or by listening to someone read it aloud. He makes a case for both as distinct experiences. Listening to a poem allows one to enjoy the rhythm without knowing the length of the poem, while reading it from the page offers a visual appreciation of the stanzas—and the ability to see the enjambments. I love new vocabulary words.
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
THE LIGHT BETWEEN OCEANS by M.L. Stedman
It's the 1920s, and Tom Sherbourne is the new lighthouse
keeper for Janus Rock, off the eastern coast of Australiia. His wife Isabel has just suffered her third
miscarriage when a boat runs aground on their island with a dead man aboard and
an infant who is very much alive. She
persuades Tom not to report the boat or the body so that they can keep and
raise the baby. Tom, however, is wracked
with guilt, and serious trouble ensues when they find out who the baby's
parents are. There are two things that I
really did not like about this novel.
First of all, I don't quite buy it when someone like Tom, of unblemished
integrity, does something really wrong.
He's not a weak person, but the moment when the baby arrives is his
defining moment, and he makes a very stupid choice. Isabel, on the other hand, is grief-stricken
from the loss of three children and sees this baby as her gift from God. She has obviously become unhinged, and Tom
knows this. OK, she turns out to be a
very good mother, but I was very disappointed in Tom's failure to do the right
thing in a timely manner. After a few
years have passed, the charade has gone on too long and returning the baby to
her biological family is a messy proposition.
The other thing that I did not like about the plot is how it hinges on
an unlikely coincidence. The timing of
the baby's arrival, shortly after Isabel's most recent miscarriage, makes the substitution
of one baby for another all too easy to pull off. That said, morbid curiosity drove me to keep
reading, and I have to say that I rather liked the ending—not too sour and not
too sweet.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)