I don’t know what possessed me to read two fantasies in a
row. I know that The Dark Tower movie is slated to come out this summer, but I’m
stopping with Book I in this series. The
gunslinger, whose name is Roland, is on a quest to find the Dark Tower
(purpose: unknown) with an intermediate
encounter with the “man in black.” I thought at first that the “man in black”
was Death or the devil, who has the power of resurrection, but Roland is no
saint himself. Other than Roland’s
wiping out a town, nothing much happens.
A boy named Jake becomes Roland’s sidekick for part of the journey, and
he seems to provide some sort of conscience, but that’s about it. After I read the book, I went back and read
the introduction and found that Stephen King wrote this book in 1970. The author himself proclaims this book to be
pretentious and demonstrating the influence of an abundance of writers’
workshops. Is this book supposed to be
about a post-apocalyptic future or perhaps an alternate universe? Again, King gives us a few hints but not a
lot else to go on, and I’m thinking the desert in question is the Mohave, and
the big chasm is the Grand Canyon.
Anyway, why does Jake seem to be more informed about the past than
Roland, when Jake is so much younger? I
suppose these unanswered questions have inspired other readers to continue with
the series. I know this series was inspired
by the Child Rowland fairy tale, alluded to in Shakespeare’s King Lear and then immortalized in
Robert Browning’s poem, but this book does not stand on its own merits, without
its possibly more meaty sequels. I can
also see Tolkien’s influence, but then I struggled to get through The Lord of the Rings trilogy as
well. The movies were marvelous, though,
and I hope the same will be true of the film version of The Dark Tower.Wednesday, February 22, 2017
THE DARK TOWER I: THE GUNSLINGER by Stephen King
I don’t know what possessed me to read two fantasies in a
row. I know that The Dark Tower movie is slated to come out this summer, but I’m
stopping with Book I in this series. The
gunslinger, whose name is Roland, is on a quest to find the Dark Tower
(purpose: unknown) with an intermediate
encounter with the “man in black.” I thought at first that the “man in black”
was Death or the devil, who has the power of resurrection, but Roland is no
saint himself. Other than Roland’s
wiping out a town, nothing much happens.
A boy named Jake becomes Roland’s sidekick for part of the journey, and
he seems to provide some sort of conscience, but that’s about it. After I read the book, I went back and read
the introduction and found that Stephen King wrote this book in 1970. The author himself proclaims this book to be
pretentious and demonstrating the influence of an abundance of writers’
workshops. Is this book supposed to be
about a post-apocalyptic future or perhaps an alternate universe? Again, King gives us a few hints but not a
lot else to go on, and I’m thinking the desert in question is the Mohave, and
the big chasm is the Grand Canyon.
Anyway, why does Jake seem to be more informed about the past than
Roland, when Jake is so much younger? I
suppose these unanswered questions have inspired other readers to continue with
the series. I know this series was inspired
by the Child Rowland fairy tale, alluded to in Shakespeare’s King Lear and then immortalized in
Robert Browning’s poem, but this book does not stand on its own merits, without
its possibly more meaty sequels. I can
also see Tolkien’s influence, but then I struggled to get through The Lord of the Rings trilogy as
well. The movies were marvelous, though,
and I hope the same will be true of the film version of The Dark Tower.Wednesday, February 15, 2017
THE MAGICIANS by Lev Grossman
If Harry Potter and friends were a little too squeaky clean
for you, this book might be just the ticket, especially if you love fantasy
novels in general. Quentin Coldwater
unexpectedly finds himself at Brakebills College, which, like Hogwarts, is a
school of magic for those with magical gifts.
Unlike Hogwarts, there’s a whole lot of drinking going on and a decent
amount of sex. Quentin is a melancholy
teenager with a bit of attitude and an obsession with a children’s book series
about an alternate universe called Fillory—clearly akin to Narnia. This novel has some high-flying moments, both
literally and figuratively, but Grossman is no Rowling. I found the Harry Potter books to be entertaining,
suspenseful and very clever, whereas this is more about agonizing over how to
have a fulfilling life when you can conjure up anything you want. For me, the kids are definitely more
compelling characters while in school and still learning the extents to which
they can manipulate the universe than after they become adults with too much
time on their hands. There has to be a
quest, and there is…of sorts—after graduation.
However, it’s more of an exploration and ultimately a dangerous
adventure. Although a specific goal does
emerge, it gets tangled up with a spate of strange creatures that don’t seem to
have any real purpose other than to instigate mayhem. This novel was just not my thing, so I won’t
be investing any time in the sequels or the TV series.Wednesday, February 8, 2017
THE ZOOKEEPER'S WIFE by Diane Ackerman
Amid all the horrors of WWII, heroes and heroines did rise
to save as many Jews as they could. In
this case, the Zabinskis—Antonina and Jan—are Warsaw zookeepers who refuse to
give up. Serving as a waystation en
route to more permanent refuges, they gladly provide temporary shelter to
hundreds of Jews. They manage to save
not just people but also art, animals, and a massive, meticulously compiled
insect collection. The author culls
Antonina’s diaries to deliver an in-depth history of the impact of the war on
the residents and structures of Warsaw.
The residents include both the human and animal varieties, and both
suffer upheaval and countless loss of life.
Almost everyone who lodges in the Zabinskis’ villa at one time or
another survives the war, but the animals are not so fortunate. Ackerman minces no words in her descriptions
of the brutalities and senseless killings that Warsaw suffers at the hands of
the Germans. The animals steal the show
in this novel, providing both occasional humor as well as heartbreaking
poignancy, as the family chooses some unusual species as pets. On the whole, the book is very readable and
historically enlightening but a little distant as far as the humans are
concerned. Even the horrific scene where
Antonina believes that her son has been shot is not as moving as I would expect
it to be. In other words, the author
recounts events without speculating on the associated emotional responses. I enjoy reading nonfiction books that read
like novels, but this is not one of them.
It reads like history, and I am not a history buff. That’s not to say that this isn’t a story
that needs to be told. It is, but the
telling of it may be more vivid in the movie.Wednesday, February 1, 2017
THE NIX by Nathan Hill
Faye abandoned her husband Henry and 11-year-old son Samuel
and 20 years later is arrested for tossing a handful of gravel at a right-wing
politician. Samuel is now a disenchanted
college professor who spends all of his free time playing video games. Having squandered his advance for a book
deal, he now needs to start writing in earnest or earn megabucks in Jakarta as
a teacher, as advised by his publisher.
His mother’s attorney wants him to write a letter attesting to Faye’s
good character, but his publisher wants him to write a scathing tell-all about
Faye’s radical past, of which Samuel has no knowledge whatsoever. The novel tells the story of both mother and
son with extensive flashbacks to Faye’s brief stint in college in Chicago
during the 1968 Democratic Convention and associated protests. The 1968 passages are action-packed, but the
21st century stuff not so much.
In fact, an entire rambling one-sentence chapter is devoted to the
musings of another video game addict, and I did not get the purpose of
including him in the book at all, which is way too long anyway. On the plus side, the writing is wonderful
but a little pretentious, especially in the aforementioned chapter. The most entertaining character in the book
is Laura Pottsdam, a student who Samuel loves to hate, because she cuts class
and plagiarizes a writing assignment. Her
rationalization of how she has cheated her way through her entire education and
then her doubt about her ability to succeed in a glamorous marketing job after
college are priceless. Then when a
character from Faye’s wild and crazy past is identified in Samuel’s present, I had
to applaud the beauty of the irony.Wednesday, January 25, 2017
THE GIRL WHO CAME HOME by Hazel Gaynor
A group of folks from Ireland set out for a better life in
America—on the Titanic.
Seventeen-year-old Maggie seems to be the only one not really excited
about going, and that’s because she’s leaving behind the man she loves. Now that her mother has died, though, she
must accompany her aunt back to the U.S.
We know that Maggie survives, because 70-odd years later, she is the
great-grandmother of Grace, who has given up college to take care of her ill
and grieving mother. Grace, too, left a
boyfriend behind, as well as an opportunity to submit a feature story to the Chicago Tribune. Maggie encourages Grace to resume her
college career, reconnect with her boyfriend, and write Maggie’s story. I sort of liked this novel, but I found it
hard to separate it from the movie. I
was glad, though, that the book did not dwell on the disaster itself, because
certainly I saw enough of that in the movie.
I also did not feel that this novel tugged at my heartstrings, as the
victims are not very robust characters.
An unexpected twist at the end was gratifying, and the prose is smooth
but not noteworthy. I discovered at the
end that true events, besides just the sinking of the ship, inspired this
book. I think this novel works as a
tribute but not necessarily as an absorbing read.Wednesday, January 18, 2017
WHEN BREATH BECOMES AIR by Paul Kalanithi
I generally steer clear of memoirs, particularly about
death. However, this book has garnered
so much press that I felt obligated to read it.
A friend passed it along, and I was happy to see that it was very
small. Paul Kalanithi learns, before he finishes
his residency in neurosurgery at Stanford, that he has terminal cancer. He accepts his fate with grace but also a
sense of urgency, because there is so much that he wants to accomplish. This book, though, is not just about his
approach to his own death, but, more importantly, I think, it is about his
approach to the mortality of his patients.
Paul is intrigued by the whole idea of the mind as a product of the
brain, where the mind embodies all those traits and emotions that we regard as
human: hope, love, courage, ambition. I know that the role reversal of patient and
doctor is supposedly a central theme of this book, but I didn’t really see it
that way. Paul very much participates in
his own treatment, without browbeating his oncologist, but he researches his
diagnosis thoroughly enough to have a peer-to-peer conversation with her. My favorite part of the book is probably his
widow’s epilogue, in which she gives us details that Paul chose not to share. I’m glad I read this book, if only to find
out what all the fuss was about, but I had a rather lukewarm reaction to
it. I love that this book is his legacy,
particularly for his family, and that, through this book, his influence is
far-reaching. However, I think the lives
he improved and saved with his scalpel and his compassion in a short period of
time are his most important legacy.Wednesday, January 11, 2017
COMMONWEALTH by Ann Patchett
Haven’t you always wondered what your life would look like
as a movie? The two families in this
novel get to experience just that after Franny makes the mistake of telling her
lover, a well-known author, the story of her stepbrother’s death. A bestseller is born and eventually a movie. Actually, everything begins at Franny’s
christening, when a party-crashing assistant DA falls for Franny’s mother. The ensuing divorces and marriage result in a
blended family with six children--Franny, her sister, and their four
stepsiblings. We get to know all of
these people as adults, but I had some difficulty keeping straight who were the
offspring of which divorced couple, probably because there were two daughters
in both families. Maybe the names could
have been a little less generic than Franny, Caroline, Holly, and
Jeannette. Only Albie, the only boy to
survive to adulthood, has a standout personality as a child, and not just
because he’s the only boy. He’s a
troublemaker of the first order, who becomes even less manageable after the two
traumatic events of his life—his parents’ divorce and his brother’s death. The timeline in this book is not strictly
sequential, allowing the author to save the most important detail—how one of
the six children dies—until very late in the book. For me, this tidbit was what I kept reading
to find out. Not that I minded spending
time with these characters. As adults,
they blossom from four virtually indistinguishable girls into four very unique
and strong women. I leave Albie’s fate
for you to find out. This book may not
be as exotic as State of Wonder or Bel Canto, but it’s still a pleasurable
read.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)