TELL ME EVERYTHING by Elizabeth Strout

Bob Burgess is the central character here, but the book is populated with lots of people in his orbit:  his wife Margaret, his ex-wife Pam, his brother Jim, his friend Olive Kitteridge, and his friend Lucy Barton.  All of these people have appeared in Strout’s other books, but one new character, Matt, is accused of murdering his mother.  Bob signs on as Matt’s defense attorney and firmly believes in Matt’s innocence.  Bob’s other problem is that he may be falling in love with Lucy, who describes Bob as a “sin-eater”—someone who absorbs other people’s failings.  In other words, Bob—a married man—is not the type to be committing sins of his own, like adultery.  The main action, if you want to call it that, may revolve around Bob, but the central theme seems to be unrecorded lives.  Lucy and Olive get together regularly to swap stories about themselves and others.  Some of these stories are significant, and some are not, and I have already forgotten most of them.  Therein lies the problem for me:  there are just too many stories.  I think a trend toward an amalgamation of vignettes is developing in literary fiction, and I’m not wild about it.  Fortunately, here Bob is the anchor that supplies the main artery of the book, but there are a lot of tributaries that drifted away from my consciousness all too fast.

VICTORY CITY by Salman Rushdie

Two former cowherds sprinkle magic beans in ancient India, and what pops up?  Not a beanstalk but an entire city called Bisnaga.  Pampa Kampana, a woman who ages so slowly that she lives almost 250 years, provides the magic, and her narrative poem, discovered over four centuries later, supplies the story.  This fantasy novel comes across as a sort of parable or fable, but I’m not sure what the moral of the story is.  Great empires are fragile?  Bisnaga starts out as a melting pot for all types of people of various religions, and its military force is all women.  However, rulers come and go here, and most of them are not so enlightened.  The problem with this book is that it fails to fulfill my expectations of good fiction—suspense, complicated characters, and perhaps a cataclysmic event.  None of these components are present, and I was never invested in this tale.  The fact that it is based on a real city, minus the supernatural stuff, makes this book marginally more appealing.

HOW TO STOP TIME by Matt Haig

Tom Hazard has been alive for centuries due to an abnormality that causes him to age very slowly.  He has met Shakespeare and F. Scott Fitzgerald and has to keep moving so that people don’t start noticing that he still looks the same after years and years.  The love of his life, Rose, died of the plague, but they had a daughter, Marion, who inherited Tom’s condition.  The author definitely makes a case for not wanting to live forever, as all that keeps Tom going is his search for Marion.  Hendrich is the somewhat tyrannical head of the Albatross Society, which is a group of people with Tom’s condition.  Tom wrestles with doubt as to whether Hendrich really has his best interests at heart, but Tom thinks the society is his best chance for locating Marion.  The pace is not lively, as Tom constantly ponders whether he wants to continue living.  I get his fatigue with life, sort of, but he has the body of a 40-year-old.  His real problem is that he feels he can’t get too attached to people without divulging his condition eventually, knowing that they won’t believe him.  I think the premise here holds a lot of promise, but I don’t think the author makes the most of this semi-realistic alternative to time travel.  However, this book is way more convincing than Haig’s The Midnight Library, which also had a depressed protagonist, but I feel that this novel could have been so much more.

CHAIN-GANG ALL-STARS by Nana Kwame Adjei-Brenyah

A research scientist in this novel goes to prison for burning down her own lab, in which she has perfected the science of inflicting pain.  Apparently her work survives, however, as an instrument of torture known as the Influencer.  It is used on anyone who doesn’t toe the line—civilian protesters and incarcerated criminals alike—in the not too distant future.  The real story here, though, is that the spectacle of gladiators has made a comeback.  Prisoners fight one another to the death as a spectator sport, and their lives are chronicled on reality TV.  Two women, Hurricane Staxxx and Loretta Thurwar, are the stars of these battles, and they also happen to be lovers.  Their adoring fans are either Team Staxxx or Team Thurwar, but some pushback against this violence does exist, especially when a sports TV anchor walks off the set in protest.  The only upside for these prisoners is that they will be exonerated and set free if they can survive three years on the circuit, and Thurwar is on the cusp of her three-year mark.  The problem with this book is that I never warmed to any of these characters.  As a reader I felt almost like one of the TV viewers of these characters’ lives in that I saw them but didn’t really get to know them.  I’m not usually a fan of footnotes, but I did find the ones in this book revealing, as the author cites real legal references that often either support or refute the notion of prisoners killing each other.  The author doesn’t make clear whether this practice was introduced as a deterrent to violent crime and then evolved into entertainment or whether the viewing pleasure aspect was its intention all along.