I was so excited to begin reading this book, and that
enthusiasm lasted about halfway through.
Then the book began to drag—on and on and on. Also, this madcap mystery bears a striking
resemblance to The
Cuckoo's Calling, with about the same degree of absurdity. Here the narrator is a journalist, Scott
McGrath, who attracts a couple of hangers-on:
Nora—a coatcheck girl who was the last person to see Ashley alive—and
Hopper, whom Scott encounters at the scene of Ashley's suicide. Ashley was a former piano prodigy and the
daughter of Stanislas Cordova, a film-noir director, whom Scott famously accused
of criminal behavior years ago. Scott
wants to vindicate himself and recover his reputation by finding Cordova
somehow responsible for Ashley's death.
Hopper has his own reasons for joining this quest, and I never figured
out what Nora's motives were. Scott has
a diabolical sort of Alice in Wonderland
adventure that may have actually happened and may have involved a significant
amount of black magic, or may have been a wild hallucination. One symbol that runs throughout the novel is
that of "a tapeworm that's eaten its own tail." Scott's pursuit of the truth here certainly
falls into the category of a trail that seems to circle back on itself. He meets lots of wacky characters (as did the
afore-mentioned Alice) who lead him
on the proverbial wild goose chase and then vanish into thin air. The writing is impeccable ("It was a
clear winter day with all the bounce and bright-eyed resilience of a teenager…,
the two-day-old snow crunching like cake icing under our boots."); it's
just not enough.
Wednesday, January 29, 2014
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
ONCE WE WERE BROTHERS by Ronald H. Balson
I was reluctant to read this book, but several people told
me they loved it, so I borrowed a copy and dove in. I found the storytelling to be decent, but
the other facets of the book dragged it down so much that I have to disagree
with all those proponents. The dialog is
stilted, and the character development is non-existent. Catherine is an overworked attorney whose
friend Liam, a private investigator, introduces her to Ben, a Polish Holocaust
survivor. Ben is convinced that a
prominent Chicago philanthropist is
a former Nazi who absconded with his family's treasures, including a sizeable
amount of cash. (I didn't understand why
this Jewish family didn't keep a large chunk of their cash for escape purposes;
if they were giving their valuables to someone for safekeeping, then surely
they suspected that they might have to flee.)
Catherine becomes somewhat of a broken record as she incessantly laments
the billable hours that she sacrifices in order to hear Ben's story. (The lady doth protest too much.) Eventually, of course, she buys into his
story so completely that she's willing to risk everything in order to help him
obtain retribution. I, on the other
hand, just did not warm up to him and never felt as moved by Ben's story as Catherine
was. In fact, Ben got on my nerves with
his refusal to cut to the chase. Plus,
some of the things he did to help rescue his family back in the 1940s, such as
impersonating a Nazi officer, seemed a bit far-fetched. That episode is not really any more preposterous,
though, than the fact that an attorney would spend hours of office time
listening to an old man's story.
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
A LAND MORE KIND THAN HOME by Wiley Cash
Here's another novel about Southerners behaving badly. Yes, I know, this is about a rural community,
and obviously this kind of thing really happens, but the Pentecostals are even
starting to give up speaking in tongues.
This book is set 30 years ago, I think, but still…. We have 3 first-person narrators (very
Faulkneresque): Jess (a 9-year-old boy
that, once again, I initially thought was a girl), Adelaide (an elderly woman), and Clem (the sheriff). Just the fact that the sheriff is one of the
narrators does not portend well for this community. The villain is Carson Chambliss, pastor of a
small church where snake-handling is the norm.
One elderly woman has already died due to this practice, but the
so-called Christian parishioners dumped her body in her backyard so that there
would be no suspicions surrounding the church.
Adelaide now keeps all the children at her house during the
services to protect them from the caged rattlers. Jess peeks in a church window one Sunday and
observes church members trying to cure his older brother Stump of muteness by
laying on hands, which is not as gentle a process as one might think. All in all, Chambliss is one of the scariest
religious fanatics ever, and he's having an affair with Jess's mother. There must be some charisma there, but that
didn't come across to me. In fact, I
like for my characters to be a little more nuanced, but he is bad to the bone. When Jess inadvertently causes the zealots to
believe that a miracle has occurred, the consequences are dire. Jess's paternal grandfather, whom the sheriff
blames for his son's death, reenters the picture as a somewhat reformed man. This book did not teach me anything, nor did
it move me or entertain me all that much, but it inspired a pretty lively book
club discussion.
Wednesday, January 8, 2014
THE DINNER by Herman Koch
If you need to like the characters in order to
like the book, this is not the novel for you.
The setting is a pretentious, absurdly overpriced restaurant in Amsterdam and begins innocently enough. Paul, his brother Serge, and their wives are
meeting for dinner to talk about their children. Paul is the narrator and has nothing but
snide contempt for his brother, running for Prime Minister of the Netherlands. Serge thrives
on being in the limelight, and Paul, a history teacher on medical leave, is
obviously quite envious of Serge's success.
We soon learn that these four people are all despicable, and some of
them are probably sociopaths. Worse yet
are Paul and Claire's son Michel and Serge and Babette's son Rick, who have together
committed an atrocity without suffering any consequences whatsoever. What the teenage boys do is bad enough, but
their parents' responses are the most appalling aspect of the novel. This is not merely about damage control, and these
boys have more than just a case of affluenza.
I'm not sure if the author is making a statement about our society and
goes way overboard, or if he is having a little sadistic fun, making us squirm
over parental attitudes that are beyond disturbing. In fact, Claire and Paul share such an
atrocious rationalization of their son's actions that we shudder at how two
such people would find each other, with neither able to offer a moral compass
for their son. I like for characters to
be striped with a little good and a little bad, and characters this one-dimensional
seem too unreal. However, three of the
four parents are so jaw-droppingly vile, that morbid curiosity got the better
of me. Can you imagine protecting a
child's "future" when that future probably holds increasingly more
violent acts? I would read a sequel.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014
CITY OF WOMEN by David R. Gillham
Some reviewers have called this book a thriller, and I'll go
along with that, but this is no beach read.
Sigrid is living with her despicable mother-in-law in Berlin
during WWII while her husband Kaspar is serving in the Germany
army. To add some sparkle to her life,
Sigrid has indulged in an affair with a married Jew named Egon, who has now
gone into hiding. As if this
relationship weren't risky enough, she befriends Ericha, a neighbor's nanny,
who is helping to hide Jews and smuggle them out of the country. From here, things start to get very dicey and
complicated, with men who may or may not be Gestapo and a family in hiding who
may or may not be Egon's wife and children.
Having already served as Egon's courier on several occasions, Sigrid
soon becomes involves in Ericha's work as well and finds that she has untapped
strengths and talents, as she comes to realize that the horrors she hears about
from the BBC are not propaganda. She
becomes increasingly reckless with her own life, given that it's fairly
torturous anyway, between her clerical job in the patent office and the RAF air
raids almost every night. She's a bit of
a chameleon, nervy at times, occasionally reluctant, sleeping with the enemy,
and relying on her intuition to help her make savvy choices and elude
trouble. Simultaneously her greatest
asset and her greatest weakness, though, is her passion, propelling her into questionable
sexual liaisons on the one hand and into the dangerous world of saving lives on
the other.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)