data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e490f/e490f52f627fa3a09dc0226c062f0254d9c47c69" alt=""
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
THE UNCOUPLING by Meg Wolitzer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e490f/e490f52f627fa3a09dc0226c062f0254d9c47c69" alt=""
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
CLOSE YOUR EYES by Amanda Eyre Ward
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/223d0/223d0653810f9605708fdc197cce5df12223fdb5" alt=""
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
FALLING TOGETHER by Marisa de los Santos
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c21f9/c21f96c8eccf698368fb369e383879e24cc13b46" alt=""
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
ROBOPOCALPYSE by Daniel H. Wilson
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81b7/c81b718f3ebab5d01cbe0aee0a6b1a742db310bd" alt=""
A war against robots is as ludicrous to me as time
travel. The Terminator had both, and for some reason that appealed to me,
but there's no Schwarzenegger equivalent here.
The juggernaut-robot in this novel is buried in Alaska
and has no personality. The humans seem
pretty vanilla also, and I had some difficulty keeping them straight. Each chapter is a video transcript, diary
entry, or other document from the war, and I wasn't wild about this format,
either, which reminds me of the Star Trek
captain's log voiceover. Three characters, however, did stand out. One is Cormac Wallace, who has assembled all
these snippets and ultimately has an argument with his brother that bears
consideration: How much like the
machines do we have to become in order to survive? In other words, do we have to sacrifice our
humanity? Another key character is
Mathilda, a child whose eyes the machines have replaced so that she can see into
the machines themselves. This experiment
seems ill-advised on the part of the machines, since she uses her power against
them. My favorite, though, is a Japanese
man whose "wife" is a robot.
When she turns on him during the robot uprising, he has to take her
offline and then misses her terribly. I
get that. I also like the fact that the
humans are not warring with each other and are united in their efforts against
a common foe. Why are the machines
waging war? Here's my favorite line in
the book: "It is not enough to live
together in peace with one race on its knees." Doesn't that succinctly describe the cause of
most of history's rebellions?
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
THE LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS by Vanessa Diffenbaugh
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66221/6622126d94189041f5ffeac21011de59b9022b52" alt=""
After bouncing around among assorted unpleasant foster homes
since infancy, Victoria Jones is now being thrust out into the world
("emancipated") on her 18th birthday. Victoria
is an angry young woman who flinches at being touched and who believes that she
is unable to sustain any sort of bond with another person. We learn about Victoria's
past through alternating chapters that reflect mainly on the year she spent
with Elizabeth, a vintner who taught Victoria
the language of flowers. Elizabeth
was saintly in her forgiveness of 10-year-old Victoria's
many transgressions, which were not slip-ups but intentional acts of
meanness. Victoria
outdid herself in the malice that caused her to leave Elizabeth's
care, and now, 8 years later, she strikes up a friendship of sorts with Elizabeth's
nephew, Grant, who grows flowers to sell to florists like Renata. Elizabeth's
knowledge of flowers and the emotions they are supposed to evoke (jealousy,
love, regret, etc.) have landed her some occasional work for Renata. As she struggles to limit her emotional
attachments, Victoria encounters
a slew of encouraging and caring people, including Renata, who help guide her
through a transition to a woman who can thrive in the real world. This smattering of friends and mentors seemed
a little unlikely, and the storyline is a little too typical for my
tastes. I found Elizabeth's
unconditional love of Victoria a
bit unbelievable, too, but the author has more experience with foster children
than I do, and I'm sure she has the ability to tolerate misbehavior more
patiently than I ever could. Despite
these minor drawbacks, the novel is charming.
The most obvious consequence of having read it is that now I'll want to
consult a flower dictionary before sending anyone a floral arrangement.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)